Aristotle distinguished between a postulates and an axioms. To a modern students they are just facts to memorize but he regarded a postulate as "basic truths that are peculiar to each particular science" and an axiom as truths that are common to all.
Numbers and Magnitude was also clarified by Aristotle. Magnitude(which is continuous) is "divisible into divisibles that are infinitely divisible while a number(which he claimed is discrete) are made up indivisible units.
Two things are in succession if there is none of their kind in between them. Aristotle claimed things are continuous "when they touch and when 'the touching limits of each become one and the same'" (pg 45 Katz)
Although Aristotle emphasized syllogism Greek mathematicians chose to use other forms to build their logical argument. Chrysippus of Soli(280-206) was one of the more notable people that studied the the basic forms of argument used to construct mathematical proof. The basic rules of inference, which is what Chrysippus called the forms of arguments are based on propositions, statements that can be either true or false.
Rules of inference:
- Modus ponens: If p, then q. [ex: p. Therefore q]
- Modus tollens: If p then q. [ex: not q. Therefor no p]
- Hypothetical syllogism: If p, then q. If q, then r. Therefore if p, then r.
- Alternative syllogism: p or q [ex: Not p. Therefore q.]
- Is there an advantage of using the rules of inference over syllogisms since many Greek mathematics did not use the later?
- Did Aristotle use syllogism himself?
Interesting: 7
quality: 8
complexity: 5
No comments:
Post a Comment